Anonymized case study

Papers a board could decide on without follow-up questions

Context Executive-level project work | Banks and insurers

Starting point

The board had to decide, and the papers for it were too long, not comparable and disconnected from implementation.

Target picture

Board formats after which the direction is clear and implementation can start.

Approach

  1. Settled what had to be decided and which facts were missing for it.
  2. Built the options so they could be laid side by side.
  3. Fixed follow-up, ownership and dates.

Result

  • Faster decisions, because the options were comparable.
  • The implementation teams knew after the meeting what to do.

Lessons

  • A board paper works when it is short, makes the options comparable and says who does what afterwards.

‹ All case studies

Free and without obligation, around 30 minutes

A similar initiative? Let us talk

In 30 minutes we look at what carries over to your project.